Released: 1984-03-09
A traveling couple end up in an abandoned Nebraska town inhabited by a cult of murderous children who worship a demon that lives in the local cornfields.
Horror
Thriller
5.7 / 1194
Duration: 92 min.
Budget: $800.0k
Revenue: $14.6M
John Chard
Rating:6/10
And a child shall lead them... Who would have thunk it, that one of Stephen King's short stories would spawn a gargantuan movie franchise? Children of the Corn is one of those movies that horror fans of a certain age, who started to blossom in the 1980s, remember fondly but agree that now it's a bit, well, corny. Peter Horton and Linda Hamilton get trapped in a village of the damned where the children have killed the adults and established a religious order that gives worship to the devil of the corn. Isaac Chroner (John Franklin) and Malachai Boardman (Courtney Gains) head the creepy kid cult, corn does sway, blood does flow, poor special effects do down the devil, yet it's atmospheric as heck fire and still a bunch of fun if you forgive it its dated foibles. 6/10
Wuchak
Rating:5/10
***Children of the damned… in the cornfields of the American prairie*** A young couple traveling through the endless cornfields of Nebraska (Peter Horton & Linda Hamilton) visits a town so far off the beaten track it’s not even on the map. Yet it seems abandoned, except for some kids scurrying around. Horror ensues. “Children of the Corn” (1984) takes the remote Plains town setting of “The Last Picture Show” (1971) and gives it a horror spin based on Stephen King’s short story. The later “Husk” (2011) used the same template. King, however, wasn’t pleased with the results, as conveyed in his statement: "My feeling is like a guy who sends his daughter off to college. You hope she'll do well. You hope she won't fall in with the wrong people. You hope she won't be raped at a fraternity party, which is pretty well what happened to Children of the Corn." The uninhabited town with scavenging kids makes the film come across as a post-apocalyptic flick. The protagonists are likable and the movie works up some creepy rural mood. People have described the film as sacrilegious, but it’s clear that the kids’ hybrid religion is not a true expression of Christianity since it’s clearly sullied by “he who walks behind the rows.” One of the picture’s criticisms is the ambiguity of this thing, but I suppose enough is revealed to put the pieces together. Still, the lack of exposition is disappointing. And the gaudy effects in the last act are lousy. Another arguable negative is the portrayal of the cult with the use of child & teen actors. I think they did pretty good all things considered. The growing schism between leader Isaac (John Franklin) and chief disciple Malachai (Courtney Gains) is interesting. It’s just difficult to portray diabolic cults, like witches and satanists, without getting eye-rolling and laughable. In any case, imagine the casting auditions for Malachai wherein the producers are looking for a tall teenage boy with a mean face and shocking mane. Courtney Gains enters the room and answers some questions when the producers state: "This is going well; you've just about got it clinched. But, as a formality, could you shout ‘Outlander’ at the top of your lungs?” The movie runs 1 hour, 32 minutes, and was shot mainly in Iowa. GRADE: C+
Hover to reveal
Dr Nostromo
Rating:4/10
41/100 A couple stumbles into a small town populated by a malevolent and fanatical cult of children. Finally got around to seeing this and I expected it to be a product of its time. And, I was right ...and less. The first 50 mins could have been condensed down to 15. In fact, at about the 50 min mark, one of our protagonist says, "Things just aren't happening fast enough", to which I blurted out, "Oh, I agree. Absolutely!" All sense of suspense had long since left the building in search of better pacing. Things picked up but the climax was all rather lame and ho hum. *sigh* -- DrNostromo.com
skeletonbow
Rating:4/10
I remember watching this back in the 80s when I was in my youth and it was scary and creepy at the time I guess compared to what we were used to then. I decided to revisit the film in 2026 for nostalgia sake and it was quite disappointing and doesn't hold up to the childhood memories. The pacing of the film is incredibly slow, it really drags on. The dialogue and acting is quite poor, while also overly dramatic at times. The protagonists do not really show convincingly genuine fear, and realistic emotions for what they are going through, and have no sense of urgency or even the slightest survival skills to get away from danger. It is one of those films where you end up yelling at the monitor "no don't do that!" and similar because of the extremely poor and unlikely choices the characters make that are not helpful to them surviving the ordeal. All in all it is very dated and poorly put together. I'm surprised how many sequels and remakes of this have been made, all of which seem to get low ratings. I wonder if anyone could ever turn the original work into a good film. No evidence of that in this original take however. Easter egg: I noticed when the car is parked on the highway near the start of the film there is a copy of Stephen King's Night Shift on the dashboard slightly out of focus. Final verdict: I give it 4/10.
Hover to reveal